Ordinary –
Extraordinary
Interactive Exhibitions
An
international project about prejudices, discrimination and the scape goat
phenomenon
1. Introduction
Backgrounds
Stichting
Vredeseducatie/Peace Education Projects has been founded in the end of 1992.
The foundation originates from a famous foundation for Peace Building in the
Netherlands. When this Foundation was forced by the government to integrate
into some-other organisations on the level of political awareness building,
two staffmembers decided to create a new organisation to stimulate peace
education projects in the Netherlands and in Europe. The device of the
foundation is: “Peace can be learned”. Of course every motto contains some
simplicity. But in this case it is a statement against indifference to show
that peace can be achieved by people. It is also a statement against the
widely spread thought among people that violence and war cannot be resisted.
The motto shows that people of all ages are able to learn peace in whole
their daily live: at home, in the classroom and on the street. The motto
finally includes that people are able to express their capability to overcome
conflicts that are for instance based in the diversity of the
A small highly skilled team of pedagogues and teachers found a lot of
goodwill in Holland and abroad, when they expressed their intentions of this
new foundation. In the years that followed a series of very successful
educational projects were produced in the Netherlands and other countries in
Europe. One of the most
significant projects was the continuing development and production
of Interactive Exhibitions, also named as Educational Games Circuits
in the Netherlands and in seven other European countries. This series of
exhibitions aimed at the challenges of the multicultural society are the
subject of this project summary.
Mission statement
Stichting
Vredeseducatie/Peace Education Projects as an independent institution sets
itself the mission:
To serve peace by the promotion and
implementation of educational projects in the fields of peace, development
co-operation and the multicultural society.
Activities
The
organisation is mainly involved in the development of creative teaching
packages, educational software, musicals and interactive exhibitions on the
subject of Inter-cultural Education. The activities are aimed at pupils and
teachers in primary, secondary and higher education. Also parents,
participants of educational institutions and the youth work in general belong
to the target groups.
A small
educational team generates the projects. Subsequently, a broad group of
experts set out to work from various fields. Teachers, youth workers as well
as youngsters follow the entire development process, thoroughly. The methods
are aimed at interaction, dialogue and enable children and young people of
all ethnic backgrounds to create perspectives. All activities are sponsored
on the level of projects grants by private foundations, municipalities and
the national government.
Apart from
educational materials in the Dutch language (the Netherlands and Flandres)
the foundation develops projects in other European countries as well, in
co-operation with organisations (NGO's) in the field of intercultural
learning. Among other things, an interactive exhibition has been compiled
about prejudices and the scapegoat phenomenon, in co-operation with
institutions in Belgium, Germany, France, Spain, Italy and N-Ireland. In
Russia a project was realised by means of a mobile interactive Exhibition in
co-operation with DOM - Children’s Open Museum in Moscow and various
Children’s Museums all over Russia.
2. Project Description
2.1 Concepts and design of the programme:
Mission of the project
To stimulate awareness-building
processes and to oppose prejudices and ethnocentrism by promoting an open,
tolerant and inquisitive attitude towards people in the own social
environment and elsewhere in the world, is the mission of the project
Ordinary - Extraordinary.
Main objective
To become acquainted
with the problematic and positive aspects of the differences and similarities
between people from different cultures in one’s own social situation and in
the global context by means of dialogue, interaction and personal
perspectives to act.
Subgoals:
1. The pupils are able to
explain, handle and give examples of the concepts in their daily life and in
larger social meaning of:
-
Fact and Opinion
-
True and Untrue
-
Ordinary and Extraordinary
-
Prejudice
-
Scapegoat phenomenon
-
Discrimination
-
Basic human rights
2. The pupils are able to
put the West-European history and culture in perspective, in relation to
other non-western societies.
3. The pupils discover that
people are not born with negative prejudices in their minds. They learn that
prejudices are learned by a process of internationalisation. They learn
finally to unmask prejudices.
4. The pupils learn
that the judgements to culture lifestyles, habits and traditions as normal or
strange, depend on the position of the observer.
5. The pupils will
develop insight and perspective to act in situations where discrimination
and the scapegoat phenomenon occur.
Challenges
The project challenges
the pupils on different levels. It must be a pleasure to learn about oneself
and about others. The means and learning climate is open, self directed,
attractive and within an atmosphere of respect for children. The pupils need
to:
· perceive
accurately;
· co-operate
with one another and learn to ask questions;
· empathise
with the situation of other people;
· look for
possible solutions
· learn to
express an own opinions;
· make choices
on basis of argumentation;
· search for
perspectives to act;
Target groups
· Children in context
of the school of youthwork in the age from 10 - 14 years old.
· Their teachers or facilitators in
youthwork
· Their parents
Design of the programme and methodology
Methodology
From the early
nineties the staff of Peace Education Projects became involved in Interactive
Learning as a tool to strengthen a multicultural society. These innovative
methodology of learning has a praxis based origin. The traditional points of
view on education failed in the field of awareness building programmes. We
discovered the impossibility of teaching children and young people peace and
tolerance only by showing them the terror of war and violence in the past and
nowadays, which a lot of educational projects still do. We also discovered
that there is a contradictory to teach children respect for entice
differences between people, only from the angle of the social problems of
discrimination and racism. May be children and young people will start to
think social desirable in some ways, but they still don't know how to change
their behaviour in daily life. For violence, scapegoating and prejudices are
a part of daily life of nearly every child.
So an
interactive methodology that stimulates the children and young people in the
first place to analyse the causes of these social problems instead of only
rejecting the effects, was developed. This methodology would give the target
groups the opportunity to form their own opinions and perspectives on their
own role in the multicultural society. These educational means should offer children
the opportunity to exercise the tools of respect for human rights to sustain
and strengthen a society where differences are enriching.
The development
of this interactive methodology has a lot to do with the history of the
multicultural society in the second half of the twentieth century in the
Netherlands and other European countries. When the first migration to western
Europe industry areas took place in the sixties of the last century, one
could observe a society strongly divided in Us and Them. The educational
materials that were published in these days till the eighties, represent this
attitude of Us and Them, were significant. Educational research and
revelations of children of migrants learns us that the development of a
multicultural society, needs another approach. Instead of carrying out
programmes that learn children about the traditions and habits of children
from another cultures, there is a need to design educational means about
children in general in interaction with other people. Instead of making the
children of migrants an object of the educational material, we need to make
the diversity of children subject of the programmes. The multicultural
society is in this view not something to strive or to gain but it is reality.
Us versus Them changes in We, living in a world of differences, that offers
specific tensions and enriching challenges. In that sense, we speak within
the framework of this programme about education of diversity. One of the
consequences is that we need no differentiation in our programme. All pupils
work together in the interactive exhibition.
Programme
Children visit
the interactive exhibition in groups of about 30 and it takes about one hour
and a half. After a short introduction by a videofilm, to make an appeal the
pupils concentration and involve them into the theme of the exhibition, the
children work concentrated in pairs independently. The way of learning is
interactive. The pupils interact between the panels with the themes, they
interact with one another and write down there opinion of solution in a
booklet, in most of the countries called a passport for the visit to the
exhibition is a kind of a journey. The pupils manage their own learning
process and most of the admissions are self-correcting.
From the view
of the interactive methodology, there is no guiding necessary of adults. The
teachers and other adults, play a role in the background and they are
prepared only to stimulate the pupils to give them the opportunity to develop
their own opinions and find their own solutions. The pupils have a little
booklet to write down their experiences. This booklet gives afterwards in the
classroom the material for a follow up. By this means the children are
respected in their own capability. There are not filled with more of less
political correct opinions. But they are challenged to develop their own
attitudes towards social problems that are also part of their daily life at
school, in the street and at home. We frequently call the exhibition a game
circuit to illustrate that for far most of the children, learning in such a
context is serious but also a great pleasure. For the teachers a manual is
developed, containing some theoretical backgrounds of the methodology and the
theme of the multicultural society and a lot of different educational means
and group activities. Some
suggestions are made to involve the parents to the project by a parents
evening of the school-journal.
Co-operation with other
European partners
The overall project consists of a
continuing process that started in 1994 with the first interactive
exhibition. From that time we developed several exhibitions in co-operation
with NGO’s in Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, N-Ireland, Russia. These
projects have the same, Dutch interactive exhibition as a starting point. It
was not a matter of exporting a educational means to other countries from the
Netherlands. On the contrary. Of course the innovating methodology and new
approach to the multicultural society was mostly adopted by the partner NGO’s
in other European countries. But the contents of the exhibition was
transformed in multilateral meetings and seminars to each cultural situation.
As the enclosures will show, the headlines of the exhibition and themes like
the scapegoat, discrimination and human rights are the same in the various
exhibitions. But the application was different in each country. For instance
the social and cultural impact of skin colour is a major point in countries
that have to deal with former colonies like Holland and France. The South
African term `Apartheid’ is known all over the world and from Dutch origin.
In Russia skin colour is a completely different item and plays not an
important role in the Russian version of the exhibitions. Of course Russia
knows social problems as ethnic tensions, exclusion and the scapegoat
phenomenon.
We can conclude
that there is not only a continuing process of developing interactive
exhibitions on the theme of the multicultural society but there is also an
going on cumulative process of international learning and understanding.
Financing the project
It will be
clear that the ongoing process of developing interactive exhibitions was
financed by a lot of different local, national and international governmental
institutions, private foundations and sponsors. Of course the process of
hiring out the exhibition brings money to finance the exploitation.
But the most
important contributing in this project in Holland and in other countries is
the involvement of volunteers on the local level. When an exhibition is for
three or more weeks in a small town, a group of volunteers, will foster the
project, play the role of host and stimulate the children in their learning
process. The volunteers meet one another in advance in a briefing meeting to
get acquainted with the project and the methodology. Without these thousands
of volunteers, the interactive exhibition could not be successful as it is
now.
In 2.2. some of
these financing institutions and mentioned. Frequently these organisations
are mentioned in the written materials in the enclosures.
2.2 Implementation of the programme
Chronological summary
The
programme started in 1994 with a Dutch edition of an interactive exhibition
with support of European Community to implement such a methodology in other
European countries. A year later an Italian and a Spanish version was
produced. Meanwhile we co-operated with Arbeitsstelle Weltbilder in Munster,
Germany for an exhibition in Munster surroundings. In the years that followed
a French and Russian version was produced. It generates a process of mutual
learning and synergy. The original Dutch exhibition was further developed in
a mobile version and a Table Top model in a suitcase. At the moment a pilot
project of this Exhibition in a suitcase is produced in N-Ireland. There are
also contact with NGO’s in others countries.
By
means of a summery, we describe three Dutch interactive exhibitions that were
adopted and transformed by NGK’s in Belgium, Italy, France and Russia.
Vreemd is anders heel gewoon (1994)
Een interactive tentoonstelling over vooroordelen, discriminatie
en de zondebok
(Ordinary –
Extraordinary. An interactive exhibition on prejudices, discrimination and
the scapegoat, including teachers manual and passport for children.)
The project
began with the development of this exhibition by the Stichting
Vredeseducatie/Peace Education Projects. This version of the interactive
exhibition built as a small village in schools, community halls (250m2) is
still running in the Netherlands and Flandres in two editions.
About 150.000
children visited this exhibition.
Financed a/o.
by the Ministry of education, Foreign Affairs Office (NCDO), the European
Union DG5, National Commemoration Committee. (annex 1)
Gli Altri Siamo Noi (1995)
Giochi strumenti idee per una societa
interculturale
An Italian
version of the interactive exhibition built as a small village for schools
and other room (350m2) including a teachers manual and pupils guide
(passport). Produced in co-operation with Pace e Dintorni, progetto di
Educazione alla Nonviolenza, Milano. In the years that followed this
organisation produced two other exhibitions, adapted to the particular
situation in the South of the country (Sicily).
About 45.000
children visited this exhibition.
Financed a/o.
by the European Union. Pace e Dintorni, Organismo di Volontariato Internazionale.
Я и Другой (1996)
(Me and the Other)
An interactive
exhibition about prejudices, including teachers manual and pupils guidebook.
The exhibition was built as a small village in museums (300m2) in
co-operation with DOM – Детский Открытый
Музей, Children’s Open Museum. Moscow,
Russia. DOM is providing a network of children’s museums in Russia. Children
museums in Russia play an important role in educational reforms.
About 40.000 pupils visited the exhibition that was a/o. exposed in
Moscow, St. Petersburgh, Irskoetsk, Yaroslavl, Samara, Toliatty,
Petrozavotsk, Krasnoyarsk, Omsk, Jekatharinaburgh.
Financed by TACIS/PHARE democracy program European Union Brussels, Soros
Foundation.
Le sentier de la guerre ou comment ‘leviter… (1997)
Une exposition-jeu sur la
tolérance les différences le respect de l’autre.
(The road of
war and how to prevent it… An exhibition-game on tolerance, differences and
respect for the other.)
France version
of the exhibition built as a small village in schools (200m2) in co-operation
with L’Ecole de la Paix, Grenoble France. Including development of teachers
manual and pupils guidebook.
About 30.000
pupils visited the exhibition.
Financed a/o. by Le ville de
Grenoble, L’Organisation des Nations Unies, L’Union Européenne.
De Gewoon – Vreemd Express (1997)
Mobiele tentoonstelling over de zondebok
(The normal – Strange Express, A
mobile exhibition on the scapegoat)
An interactive exhibition in a
truck meant for small villages with one or two schools. The truck is parked
in front of the school and can house a group of 35 children. Developed by the
Stichting Vredeseducatie/Peace Education Projects, including teachers manual
and pupils guidebook. About 140.000 pupils visited the Express.
Financed a/o. by Foundation
Children’s Stamps, Ministry of Welfare and ministry of Education, European
Union.
De Vooroordelenkoffer (1998)
(A suitcase on prejudices)
This suitcase, edited in 850
copies with teachers manual and pupils guidebook was implemented in the
Netherlands and Belgium (Flandres), contain 45 carton board displays that can
be exposed on tables in an desired room (school, church, youth centre ect.) an interactive exhibition on
prejudices and the scapegoat).
When every suitcase is used three
times it give an estimate number of 85.000 participants.
The project was mainly financed
a/o. by NCDO (Nat. Comm. Development Co-operation).
Gewoon – Vreemd Paleis / Le Palais de l’étrange et du
normal (1998)
(Ordinary –
Extraordinary Palace)
A bilingual
interactive exhibition on cultural diversity, including teachers manual and pupils
guidebook, built in a former warehouse in co-operation with Foyer, regional
centre for integration, Brussels, Belgium.
About 20.000
pupils visited the exhibition.
Financed
a/o. by national centre to combat racism, Commission of the Flemish Community.
Воэможно быть Другим (1999)
(The possibility and the right to be
different)
An interactive
Table Top exhibition about prejudices, human rights and scapegoat in the
classroom in co-operation with DOM – Детский
Открытый Музей, Children’s Open Museum.
Moscow, Russia. This was also accompanied by a manual for teachers,
containing the pupils guide The exhibition is used as a methodology in Civic
Education, a new task of the Russian schools. The exhibition was produced in
1.000 copies and implemented by a Train the Trainers-program in which 800
trainers are involved in four regions (Moscow, Samara, Yaroslavl,
Krasnoyarsk). In March 2000 this project will be evaluated.
The table top exhibition is very popular in Russia. We assume that
these 1.000 exhibitions in suitcases will be used in 25 groups at least. When
a schoolgroup has a average of 30 pupils, about 750.000 children participated
or will participate in this project. The
project is financed by TACIS/PHARE democracy programme European Union
Brussels and the Soros Foundation.
2.3. Evaluation
Evaluation
tools
In general it
is difficult to predict the outcome of a awareness building projects
precisely, even with valid statistic research. One of the problems concerns the
starting point, the definition of results and awareness of a social problem
in relation to ones own behaviour and the difficulties towards attitudes.
Nevertheless we can provide some important indicators in addition to the
numbers and figures described in 2.2.. These indicators provide qualitative
data in relation to the main objectives and the subgoals, which are important
to make a final evaluation. As a rule we state that the more concrete the
objectives, the more precise the evaluation. In the context of the
Interactive exhibition project we used the following tools.
during development
process
- Process evaluation by making clear
objectives and involve small experiment groups (pupils as well as children) during
the whole development process. It is an important tool to prevent mistakes
and too high pretensions.
during and after the implementation process
- Observations of visitors by
students from the University and Teachers Training Colleagues.
- The didactical involvement of
teachers and pupils in time and in intensity.
- Oral feedback and written reports
from teachers about the effects of the participation in the project and the
follow up.
- Oral feedback and written reports
from volunteers.
- All kind of materials of children
(articles, reports, posters,
essays, photographs etc.).
- Written, filmed or recorded
reviews by experts in media in general and in pedagogical magazines.
Results
In the
different countries a lot of evaluation material is available. To the projects
in Russia and in other countries, extensive reports are produced for the
organisations that offered financial support. When an exhibition is organised
in cities and villages, the inviting organisation produces evaluation
materials with the tools mentioned above. Besides that a lot of students made
an article or evaluation report on the exhibition or a part of it. In this
context, we can only give some brief headlines. If desired, further
evaluation material can be provided.
during development
process
Most important
tool was practised during the development process in the different countries.
A constant process of trial an error and learning lead to a good result. Most
important tool was the experiment group. And the most important attitude was listening
to children and teachers and try to elaborate their opinions and questions.
In this way methodological cornerstones are developed and put into practise.
Motto’s as: “We don’t want to teach what to think but teach them to think!”
came up in these pre-production stage. This way of experiential
developing was exiting for every
participant in the project. It makes the original providers of the theme and
the methodology of the project (Stichting Vredeseducatie/Peace Education
Projects) modest. For they got involved in a very interesting learning
process, for instance about the social and educational situation in Russia or
Northern Ireland.
during and after the
implementation process
In all
countries teachers are asked to fill in a written evaluation form after
visiting the exhibition.
- Nearly all teachers give an
indication to the topic of concentration. They are very surprised by the fact
that children can concentrate themselves for one hour. It says something
about the various means of learning in the interactive exhibition. Pupils are
taking seriously and apparently the themes became concerns in their daily
live.
- Teachers indicate also that the
project has a positive effect on the classroom climate. The participation of
the project stimulates an atmosphere of openness to universal psychological
themes as the scapegoat phenomenon. Children dare to come out and discuss
their attitudes towards one another.
- Teachers, mainly in Russia but
also in other countries indicate that they could improve their teaching
capabilities. The interactive approach and the methodological paradigm
stimulates them to differentiate their didactical means.
- In many cases teachers tell us a
story that is significant for the children’s reaction in relation to the
objectives of the interactive exhibition. One of the objectives will offer
the children tools to make distinctions towards facts and opinions and other
terms (see subgoals 2.1.). It often happens weeks after participating in the
project that children ask the teacher when he of she says something in the
classroom: “Sir/Madam, is this a fact of is it your opinion?” This
illustrates that children were able to integrate these terms in their minds
and that they can handle it. The same can we conclude to terms as prejudices,
discrimination and the scapegoat phenomenon.
-
From materials
from children we learn the deep involvement to scapegoat phenomenon. They
nearly all experienced it themselves in different positions as the scapegoat,
the witness or the perpetrators.
-
Especially
children with a minority ethnic background feel themselves comfortable in the
mentioned learning process. In the case of ordinary and extraordinary,
everybody is involved. I am strange in the eyes of somebody else. But the
contrary can also be true. From experience we know that it gives a balance
between moderating ones own culture on one hand and be proud of ones own
roots on the other hand.
-
From children’s
material, we learn a lot of prejudices. They experience it every day, with
themselves as a subject and as a object. (I have prejudices to Roam-people.
And: Children don’t have an opinion. Or children have a big mouth.) A lot of
them evaluate the unmask method in the teachers manual as very positive. They
discover that prejudices are learned from parents, media etc. And that they
can get rid of it by asking questions.
2.4. Future
Planning of the project
The different projects
will continue in the near future in various ways. As already mentioned the
second project in Russia will be evaluated in March 2000. We will try to
formulate a follow up programme.
In Italy, they partner
NGO developed a second exhibition on violence and aggression and will
exchange their experiences.
In Northern Ireland we
will work on the implementation of the Table Top Model after the evaluation
of the pilot project.
In France and Belgium
meetings will be organised to exchange information about experiences with the
exhibitions.
Although not a part of
the project description, the Stichting Vredeseducatie/Peace Education
Projects developed a new interactive exhibition in a former military Fortress
in Utrecht about the scapegoat phenomenon in relation to the history of
second world war. Because this Fortress was during this war used as a
execution place where 140 men, mainly from the resistance, are executed by
the nazi’s. In this new Remembrance Centre for the Future children can learn
what resistance nowadays means in society and in their daily life. For we think
that the best way of commemorating the men that were killed at this site, is
to exercise ourselves in their ideals of liberty and democracy. The Stichting
Vredeseducatie will try to find partners in other countries to elaborate
these themes and means and continuing the learning process.
Utrecht, January 2000
|